Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alison F. Takemura results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 533 hits . Analysis detected 3,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,530 of 6,628 authors). This Alison F. Takemura is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Alison F. Takemura
Author details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst