Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice C. Hill results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 989 hits . Analysis detected 7,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,651 of 6,628 authors). This Alice C. Hill is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Alice C. Hill
Author details
Total words: 9,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst