Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexandra Olson The Associated Press results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 835 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (755 of 6,382 authors). This Alexandra Olson The Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Alexandra Olson The Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
89%Alexandra Olson The Associated Press (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 888
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles888 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 26.9%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos