Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexander Shur results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Pessimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 135 hits . Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,837 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,622 of 6,359 authors). This Alexander Shur is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Alexander Shur
Author details
Total words: 3,837
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst