Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Alex Rennie results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,056 hits. Analysis detected 8,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Alex Rennie is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Alex Rennie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Alex Rennie (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 10,884
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos