Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Ford results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 392 hits . Analysis detected 3,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,099 of 6,399 authors). This Alex Ford is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Alex Ford
Author details
Total words: 4,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst