Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Doyle results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,101 of 6,316 authors). This Alex Doyle is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Alex Doyle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
67%Alex Doyle (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos