Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ailsa Chang results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anchoring Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 157 hits . Analysis detected 1,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of 98% (148 of 6,394 authors). This Ailsa Chang is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Ailsa Chang
Author details
Total words: 392
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.7% percentile 15.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles392 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 29.9% 29.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 35.5% 35.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 29.9% 29.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 21.2% 21.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 17.6% 17.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 18.9% 18.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.0% 40.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 14.3% 14.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 40.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 35.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 29.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 21.2%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 17.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst