Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adriana Gallardo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 1,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 879 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (414 of 6,628 authors). This Adriana Gallardo is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Adriana Gallardo
Author details
Total words: 879
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.8% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles879 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 37.1% 37.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.9% 36.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.3% 20.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.6% 5.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 37.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 36.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst