Author summary
7%1 analyzed article/video657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adeel Hassan results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 1,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,735 of 6,498 authors). This Adeel Hassan is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Adeel Hassan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Adeel Hassan (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos