Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 5,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Tschorn results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 4,567 hits . Analysis detected 16,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,069 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Tschorn is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Adam Tschorn
Author details
Total words: 21,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.2% 21.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.2%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst