Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Annaccone results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 1,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,250 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Annaccone is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Adam Annaccone
Author details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst