Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abril Elfi results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 1,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of 99% (96 of 6,628 authors). This Abril Elfi is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Abril Elfi
Author details
Total words: 588
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.6% percentile 18.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles588 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 61.2% 61.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 47.1% 47.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 23.5% 23.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 16.8% 16.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.3% 22.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 16.8% 16.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.6% 31.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 17.4% 17.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 61.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 47.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 31.6%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 22.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 17.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst