Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abraham Wyner results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Recency Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,005 of 6,628 authors). This Abraham Wyner is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Abraham Wyner
Author details
Total words: 960
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles960 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.5% 8.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.6% 14.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.9%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst