Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abraham Wyner results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,005 of 6,628 authors). This Abraham Wyner is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Abraham Wyner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
85%Abraham Wyner (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 960
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles960 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 23.9%23.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.2%12.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos