Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Covington results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,877 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,988 of 6,628 authors). This Abigail Covington is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Abigail Covington
Author details
Total words: 2,877
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst