ABC News99%

Problems with Reflecting Pool renovation as paint peels, algae blooms 90%

6/19/2026, 12:25:54 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.9% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 440 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.5% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,142 of 20,492 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the video peer group.

Workers with waders and pool cleaning equipment are working overtime at Washington's iconic reflecting pool, battling the algae that has turned one of the president's prized projects from American flag blue to green. 
>> If you take a look, not only is the green of the algae come back, but look at that American flag blue in the paint. 
It's actually starting to peel. It's coming up. 
>> That was not what the president had in mind for this project, which was completed just last week. 
>> You're going to be very proud of and it'll last for 50 to 100 years before you have to do anything with it. Very strong, powerful substance that we used. 
>> The companies that did the work to drain the pool, repair the leaks, seal and paint the bottom of the pool, and install a filtration system were awarded no-bid contracts worth about $15 million, despite having virtually no federal experience doing federal contracts. 
The project was completed last week, and for a couple of days, it seemed to work, but the water quickly started turning green. 
By the beginning of this week, algae everywhere. 
The National Park Service has brought in workers from across the country and hired another contractor to combat the algae bloom. 
Wading through the shallow water, they're using vacuum pumps and strainers to clear the water and remove the muck. 
And just days ago, workers dumped hydrogen peroxide into the pool. 
>> They've been working for days to try to kill the algae using something they call nano bubble technology, but take a look at the water here. I mean, it's still as green as can be and just plain filthy. 
>> In an elite night social media post on Wednesday, the Trump administration said the water was now, quote, crystal clear. 
It may be eventually, but it's anything but clear now. 
Officials at the Interior Department say they are confident that the water will be clear by the time the 4th of July festivities start happening here in Washington. 
As for that peeling sealant, uh we've reached out for comment from the White House and the Interior Department, no word back yet. 
>> Tom, that was incredible. They let you just walk up there and peel the paint away? 
>> I mean, look, I we didn't peel it away. 
It was it was floating around. 
[laughter] We're just showing it to you. 
Uh I mean, it's right there. It's uh it 
actually became somewhat of a tourist attraction down there. 
>> Okay. 
>> Uh now. 
>> Yeah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.1%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 34.5%ABC News: 3.1%Availability Heuristic34.5%This article: 16.4%ABC News: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic16.4%This article: 4.3%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 6.4%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias6.4%This article: 9.8%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect9.8%This article: 5.2%ABC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion5.2%This article: 12.3%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%ABC News: 1.1%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 50.9%ABC News: 7.8%Negativity Bias50.9%This article: 3.9%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 4.8%ABC News: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 1.4%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias11.8%This article: 10.9%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.0%ABC News: 3.4%Appeal to Authority23.0%This article: 2.3%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.5%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization19.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.8%ABC News: 0.5%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 25.9%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion25.9%This article: 4.3%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 15.2%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.2%This article: 2.3%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque2.3%This article: 22.7%ABC News: 0.3%Burden of Proof22.7%This article: 2.5%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.6%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal26.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%ABC News: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.6%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading1.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%ABC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

440 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers15%attributed speech374writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageNational Park Service • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageInterior Department • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTom • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

National Park Service

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words32% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-5.6 ptsWriter: 5.6%National Park Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.