NTD100%

Trump Says New Air Force One ‘The Best Plane Ever Built’ 98%

7/1/2026, 10:00:17 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 69.7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 316 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 96.9% and a BS Rank of 98% (541 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the video peer group.

This will be the first flight of what I think is maybe the greatest commercial plane ever built. 
I said to Boeing, "What's the best one?" 
They said, "This is the best plane ever built. 
built. 
And you're going to have the privilege of flying it, and I have a privilege also of flying it." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.8%NTD: 15.7%Confirmation Bias25.8%This article: 27.3%NTD: 3.9%Anchoring Bias27.3%This article: 27.3%NTD: 12.2%Availability Heuristic27.3%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 27.3%NTD: 9.3%Overconfidence Bias27.3%This article: 28.8%NTD: 22.7%Framing Effect28.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 27.3%NTD: 9.9%Optimism Bias27.3%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 17.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 28.8%NTD: 4.8%Self-Serving Bias28.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 8.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 31.8%NTD: 6.7%Halo Effect31.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%NTD: 2.3%Primacy Effect16.7%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 69.7%NTD: 14.0%Appeal to Authority69.7%This article: 12.1%NTD: 5.5%False Dilemma12.1%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.2%NTD: 17.3%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.6%NTD: 2.7%Bandwagon13.6%This article: 28.8%NTD: 22.3%Appeal to Emotion28.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 6.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 5.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 56.1%NTD: 6.4%Anecdotal56.1%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 42.4%NTD: 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)42.4%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 5.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

66 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech56writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBoeing • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBoeing • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Boeing

100%flagged-word coverage
10 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.