Futurism88%

As Much of the East Coast Is Choking on Wildfire Smoke, Texas Is Drowning in Life-Threatening Floods 90%

By Joe Wilkins84%

7/18/2026, 2:30:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 78.7% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 305 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,191 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

Fresh off a month that saw all but five states mired in severe drought, the US is reeling from multiple crises of national proportions. 
First, there's the record-breaking heat dome which is currently baking most of the continental US. 
According to the Guardian, over 100 million Americans are currently living under extreme heat warnings, forecasted to persist well into the weekend. 
At the same time, the country is being smoked out by dozens of wildfires across North America, a situation the heat wave isn't exactly helping. 
On top of that, smoke from over 800 blazes in Canada is helping choke out the US Midwest and North-East, making the air hazardous to breathe. 
Things aren't necessarily any prettier outside of the smoke-zone  just wetter. 
Communities situated around the Guadalupe River in Texas are reeling after near endless rainfall triggered massive floods across the state for the second year in a row. 
So far, at least one person is dead, while thousands have been forced to evacuate. 
At least 57 counties representing over six million people were placed under flood watches over the past few days. 
With even more rain on the horizon, it remains to be seen when Texas will get relief from the torrential downfalls. 
Stepping back, it's clear this cascade of extremes isn't happening in a vacuum. 
The overlapping wildfires, floods, and heat waves are all being amplified by the same climate forces: a rapidly warming planet, fueled in no small part by skyrocketing carbon emissions from the US itself. 
All in all, it's been an action-packed summer as the El Niño cycle rolls on  and unfortunately, the devastation is far from over. 
More on climate disaster: Scientists Propose Dimming Sun to Combat El Niño 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.1%Joe Wilkins: 6.8%Futurism: 6.1%Confirmation Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Joe Wilkins: 6.5%Futurism: 6.2%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Joe Wilkins: 3.9%Futurism: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias10.8%This article: 25.9%Joe Wilkins: 13.2%Futurism: 11.3%Framing Effect25.9%This article: 4.9%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.2%Loss Aversion4.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.7%Futurism: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.9%Futurism: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.5%Joe Wilkins: 4.7%Futurism: 4.4%Pessimism Bias30.5%This article: 78.7%Joe Wilkins: 25.8%Futurism: 22.5%Negativity Bias78.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.2%Futurism: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.5%Futurism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 24.6%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.1%Recency Bias24.6%This article: 6.2%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.0%Futurism: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.1%Joe Wilkins: 5.8%Futurism: 6.8%Appeal to Authority11.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 2.6%Futurism: 2.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 7.9%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.5%Slippery Slope7.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%Joe Wilkins: 12.7%Futurism: 10.5%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 11.5%Futurism: 9.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 4.3%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.5%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 19.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 4.3%Futurism: 4.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Joe Wilkins: 3.4%Futurism: 3.9%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 3.9%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 75.7%Joe Wilkins: 26.8%Futurism: 20.7%Biased Writer Voice75.7%This article: 10.8%Joe Wilkins: 1.8%Futurism: 2.1%Indoctrination10.8%This article: 10.8%Joe Wilkins: 5.0%Futurism: 2.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

305 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.2%attributed speech283writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageThe Guardian • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Guardian

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Guardian: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-81.6 ptsWriter: 81.6%The Guardian: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%The Guardian: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%The Guardian: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%The Guardian: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.