Shop LA Times⁠78%

Clayton Kershaw Los Angeles Dodgers Final Season 3d Acrylic BlocKart⁠97%

9/26/2025, 8:50:43 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Halo Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 76.7% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 291 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (864 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the article peer group.

Celebrate Clayton Kershaw’s legendary career with this commemorative acrylic ticket honoring his final MLB season with the Los Angeles Dodgers. 
Measuring 2.5" x 6" and crafted from a solid 3/4"-thick acrylic block, it features a striking 3D effect that makes the custom ticket design appear suspended inside. 
The back panel highlights Kershaw’s career stats and achievements, and each collectible is officially licensed by MLB and the MLBPA. 
Proudly made in the USA. 
This item is final sale. 
HOLIDAY DELIVERY: Order by 12/11 to receive before 12/25. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 65.1%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias65.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 23.3%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias23.3%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 76.7%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect76.7%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 46.5%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect46.5%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias5.8%This article: 39.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion39.5%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 23.3%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority23.3%This article: 29.1%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion29.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 23.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon23.3%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.8%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy5.8%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

86 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.