Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clayton Kershaw results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 70.9% saturation with 863 hits. Analysis detected 3,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,067 of 37,536 keywords). This Clayton Kershaw is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Clayton Kershaw
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
98%Clayton Kershaw (selected)14%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 5
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

97% percentile
025507510097.2% percentile
13.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 70.8%70.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 37.9%37.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 34.7%34.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 32.8%32.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 43.8%43.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 19.0%19.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 70.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 43.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 37.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 34.7%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate