Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlbpa results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 6,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,521 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of 99% (433 of 37,536 keywords). This Mlbpa is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Mlbpa
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
99%Mlbpa (selected)19%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,521
Article count: 6
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
18.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 84.8%84.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 56.3%56.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 47.6%47.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 55.2%55.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 36.0%36.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 28.1%28.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Keyword 84.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 56.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 55.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 47.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 36.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.1%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate