Trump Admits His Slush Fund Plans Loud and Clear 67%

By Hafiz Rashid85%

7/31/2026, 11:57:43 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 345 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of 67% (9,290 of 27,378 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the article peer group.

President Trump won’t let go of his corrupt IRS settlement. 
At a Cabinet meeting hosted Friday at Camp David in Maryland, Trump was asked by a reporter whether the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” created by his settlement with the IRS, which set aside $1.776 billion for anyone who felt politically prosecuted by the government, was actually dead and, if it was, why the Department of Justice wouldn’t put that in writing. 
“Well, it is dead, but you know, I wish it weren’t, to be honest with you. 
I think people were horribly treated, horribly abused,” Trump said . 
“I’d like to see them compensated for the pain. 
They lost their families. 
They committed suicide, many people committed suicide.” 
Trump on the weaponization fund: "It's dead, but I wish it weren't" pic.twitter.com/2S4pyKt5xm 
 Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 31, 2026 
So just to recap: Trump doesn’t want the slush fund dead, despite past claims from the Department of Justice that the fund isn’t moving forward. 
Trump was also asked about whether he was willing to waive the settlement’s provision that he, his family, and his businesses would be protected from all IRS audits in the future in order to have acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed. 
He dodged the question, only saying Blanche “should be confirmed forthwith.” 
All of this points to Trump trying to hold on to the IRS settlement even after federal judges have ruled against it. 
It raises the question of whether he’s still going to try and implement the fund secretly—and validates the Republican holdouts who are refusing to confirm Blanche until they get some answers. 
As an aside, Trump’s claim that the fund is necessary due to suicide among January 6 insurrectionists is rich. 
On Thursday, New Jersey Governor Mike Sherill proclaimed July 30 “Brian Sicknick Day,” in honor of the Capitol Police officer and Garden State native who died from his injuries one day after responding to the Capitol riots. 
Four other police officers who responded to the riots committed suicide within seven months. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 33.3%Hafiz Rashid: 7.5%newrepublic.com: 5.4%Confirmation Bias33.3%This article: 11.9%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Anchoring Bias11.9%This article: 7.2%Hafiz Rashid: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 2.6%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.4%Hafiz Rashid: 0.9%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Hafiz Rashid: 10.7%newrepublic.com: 6.6%Framing Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.4%newrepublic.com: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.7%Hafiz Rashid: 15.8%newrepublic.com: 10.7%Negativity Bias26.7%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Hafiz Rashid: 2.7%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect17.1%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Hafiz Rashid: 3.2%newrepublic.com: 3.0%Ad Hominem8.4%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.6%newrepublic.com: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.2%Hafiz Rashid: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%False Dilemma7.2%This article: 9.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 1.5%Slippery Slope9.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.1%Hafiz Rashid: 8.6%newrepublic.com: 6.5%Hasty Generalization4.1%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.3%Hafiz Rashid: 5.6%newrepublic.com: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 6.4%Hafiz Rashid: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Begging the Question6.4%This article: 6.1%Hafiz Rashid: 3.4%newrepublic.com: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 5.5%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque5.5%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.4%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.1%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.1%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%Hafiz Rashid: 3.6%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 3.8%Hafiz Rashid: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 30.4%Hafiz Rashid: 14.7%newrepublic.com: 12.2%Biased Writer Voice30.4%This article: 2.9%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 8.5%newrepublic.com: 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

345 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech291writer words
Selected voice

Donald Trump

81%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words87% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.1 ptsWriter: 36.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+34.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 34.0%34.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.