OutKick88%

ESPN's Monica McNutt apologizes to Taylor Swift, but her commentary follows an ugly trend 45%

By Bobby Burack0%

6/11/2026, 11:36:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 705 faulty-reasoning hits from 453 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 45% (11,336 of 20,472 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the article peer group.

ESPN broadcaster Monica McNutt was caught on a hot mic Wednesday night during the radio broadcast of Game 4 of the NBA Finals, accusing Taylor Swift of bandwagoning the New York Knicks. 
"Is that Taylor Swift?" 
she asked. 
"She's not a Knicks fan. 
Get out of here, girl." 
JEMELE HILL SAYS SHE FEELS 'TERRIBLY SAD' FOR KARMELO ANTHONY BECAUSE HIS LAWYER WAS WHITE 
The moment drew considerable attention. 
For one, Swifties have little tolerance for criticism or perceived disrespect toward Swift. 
McNutt was also incorrect in her assessment. 
Swift has attended numerous Knicks games dating back to 2014, including during losing seasons. 
OutKick asked McNutt via text what her issue was with Swift and why she overlooked Swift's previous visits to Madison Square Garden. 
McNutt did not respond. 
We will update this article if she does. 
She did, however, speak with TMZ on Thursday. 
"Swifties, I appreciate your passion. 
I said what I said and here's the deal, if I'm wrong, and I am wrong apparently because we've got an OG Amar'e Stoudemire jersey," McNutt said. 
"I misspoke. 
I apologize." 
The more telling part of the story is McNutt's apparent disdain for Taylor Swift. 
There's a pattern here. 
McNutt also seems to have a passionate dislike for Caitlin Clark and her White fans. 
CAITLIN CLARK BEING 'WHITE GIRL FROM THE MIDDLE OF AMERICA' HELPED CONNECT WITH YOUNG FANS, ESPN PUNDIT SAYS 
Last year, she accused little White girls who root for Caitlin Clark of racial bias. 
"Caitlin represented, and again, some of this to me probably is not fair to her, because it was not anything that she said or was truly based on her personality, but she was a white girl from the middle of America. 
And so she represented a whole lot to a lot of people, whether that is truly what she prescribed to or not," McNutt said about her fandom among young White girls. 
And what about all the young Black girls who root for Serena Williams? 
Do they also have a racial bias, or do they simply support a generational female athlete? 
Imagine employing a sports analyst who dislikes Caitlin Clark, Taylor Swift and doesn't know who NFL legend Barry Sanders is. 
The last part is real. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Last summer, McNutt guest-hosted "First Take" on ESPN and was caught during a segment having no idea who the NFL legend was. 
"Obviously, this ties to one Shedeur Sanders," McNutt said while pointing at comedian Druski, who was wearing a Honolulu blue No. 
20 Barry Sanders jersey. 
Watch: 
Blame White women for that one. 
We suspect McNutt already has. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.5%Bobby Burack: 5.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Bobby Burack: 4.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.9%This article: 11.9%Bobby Burack: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 2.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 7.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Bobby Burack: 4.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.1%This article: 15.5%Bobby Burack: 13.6%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias15.5%This article: 6.0%Bobby Burack: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 6.4%Bobby Burack: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.4%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Bobby Burack: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Bobby Burack: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Bobby Burack: 4.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem8.8%This article: 4.0%Bobby Burack: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man4.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 3.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.4%Bobby Burack: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma6.4%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.3%Bobby Burack: 12.1%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization14.3%This article: 3.3%Bobby Burack: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring3.3%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.6%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Bobby Burack: 4.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 3.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.0%Bobby Burack: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%Bobby Burack: 3.8%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.0%Bobby Burack: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Bobby Burack: 2.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 7.9%Bobby Burack: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 14.6%Bobby Burack: 19.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice14.6%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bobby Burack: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Bobby Burack: 3.9%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.3%This article: 1.8%Bobby Burack: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

453 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers33%attributed speech302writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOutKick • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 41 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMonica McNutt • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Monica McNutt

77%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words85% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.9 ptsWriter: 21.9%Monica McNutt: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%Monica McNutt: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Monica McNutt: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Monica McNutt: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Monica McNutt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.