Taco Bell now under investigation over outbreak of parasite that causes ‘explosive diarrhea,’ report says 25%

By Brendan Rascius75%

7/14/2026, 6:01:06 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 957 faulty-reasoning hits from 467 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,487 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the article peer group.

Taco Bell may be entangled in a widening outbreak of a parasitic gastrointestinal illness linked to contaminated produce, according to a new report. 
Signs posted at several Taco Bell locations in Michigan last week warned customers that the restaurants were “currently unable to sell Lettuce, Cilantro Onion, Pico de Gallo, and Guacamole due to a nationwide recall.” 
It comes as the state contends with a notable uptick in cyclosporiasis cases this year, and as state officials have warned that the outbreak may be tied to lettuce. 
While some infected individuals reported eating at Taco Bell, others had not  an indication that the outbreak is not confined to the chain. 
*The Independent* has contacted a representative for Taco Bell for comment. 
As of July 9, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed 843 cases of cyclosporiasis in 31 states since May, leading to 86 hospitalizations and no reported deaths. 
Federal officials caution, however, that the true number of infections is likely far higher. 
Health officials in Michigan, for instance, have reported over 1,500 cases, more than ten times that average annual amount. 
Spikes have also been reported in Illinois, Virginia, Ohio and New York. 
Cyclospora is transmitted when people consume food or water contaminated with fecal matter, according to the CDC. 
While cyclosporiasis cases are reported year-round, they are most common between May 1 through August 31. 
Past outbreaks have been linked to raspberries, basil, cilantro and salad mixes. 
The infection can cause symptoms including “watery diarrhea” and “explosive bowel movements,” as well as fatigue, stomach cramps, bloating, nausea, vomiting and a low-grade fever. 
It is rarely life-threatening. 
“Most people with healthy immune systems will eventually recover from cyclosporiasis without treatment,” the CDC website states. 
“However, if not treated, you may be sick for anywhere from a few days to a month or longer.” 
Symptoms may take two weeks or longer to appear, and some people remain asymptomatic  factors that can make the source of an outbreak difficult to pinpoint. 
This week, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services said the latest outbreak may be tied to lettuce or salad greens. 
“Although we do not have a definite product identified as the source of the outbreak, we want to let Michiganders know what we have learned so far so they can take steps to protect their families,” MDHHS Chief Medical Executive Dr. 
Natasha Bagdasarian said in a Monday statement. 
“Early information has shown lettuce as a common product that regularly comes up during the investigation. 
We will continue to provide updates as we learn more.” 
Rather than buying pre-washed lettuce, officials have recommended purchasing whole heads of lettuce, discarding the outer layers and washing the inner section thoroughly. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.3%Brendan Rascius: 1.8%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias14.3%This article: 10.9%Brendan Rascius: 1.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias10.9%This article: 9.0%Brendan Rascius: 3.6%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 7.7%Brendan Rascius: 1.2%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Brendan Rascius: 3.1%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias6.4%This article: 13.5%Brendan Rascius: 12.2%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect13.5%This article: 8.8%Brendan Rascius: 0.4%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion8.8%This article: 4.9%Brendan Rascius: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Brendan Rascius: 2.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 7.1%Brendan Rascius: 1.7%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 12.6%Brendan Rascius: 14.6%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias12.6%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 3.1%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.2%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 2.8%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Brendan Rascius: 2.7%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Brendan Rascius: 1.5%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 7.3%Brendan Rascius: 0.4%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.4%Brendan Rascius: 3.1%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority18.4%This article: 4.9%Brendan Rascius: 2.1%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.7%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%Brendan Rascius: 5.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.4%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.8%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 7.3%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Brendan Rascius: 2.6%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.8%Brendan Rascius: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof8.8%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.5%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.3%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.8%Brendan Rascius: 3.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote8.8%This article: 6.4%Brendan Rascius: 2.2%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 13.5%Brendan Rascius: 8.2%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 4.9%Brendan Rascius: 1.1%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 2.2%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Rascius: 1.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Brendan Rascius: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

467 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers37%attributed speech295writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageThe Independent • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Department of Health and Human Services • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 7 words • 0.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 16 words • 0.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 10 words • 0.0% coverageofficials • 23 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

officials

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words13% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%officials: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%officials: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.4 ptsWriter: 21.4%officials: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%officials: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.