Taco Bell releases statement after being reportedly identified as a possible source of parasite causing 'explosive' diarrhea | Blaze Media 35%

By Carlos Garcia64%

7/14/2026, 4:15:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 614 faulty-reasoning hits from 397 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,330 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

Thousands of Americans are getting infected with the cyclospora parasite, and health officials are looking at Taco Bell as one possible source of the uncomfortable outbreak. 
The Mexican fast-food chain reportedly stopped serving some fresh ingredients at some of its locations, and the Washington Post reported that federal and state health officials are now probing the chain. 
'FDA certainly is continuing its traceback investigation on multiple produce items, also including locations that are reported by the case patients before they became sick.' 
The parasite can infect hosts who eat contaminated produce and may cause weeks of watery diarrhea and "sometimes explosive bowel movements," according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
On Tuesday, Taco Bell issued a statement saying that it had "voluntarily and temporarily removed limited ingredients" at some restaurants "as a precautionary measure." 
The chain added that it would continue to monitor the situation and "follow the guidance of public health authorities." 
Donald Prater, the acting deputy commissioner for food at the U.S. 
Food and Drug Administration, would not confirm if Taco Bell is being investigated. 
"FDA certainly is continuing its traceback investigation on multiple produce items, also including locations that are reported by the case patients before they became sick," he said. 
Officials outlined several steps people can take to avoid the discomforting parasite: 
* Heating food to 158 degrees F or above to kill the parasite; 
* Peeling produce to reduce the chance of infection from the parasite being present on the surface; and 
* Washing all fresh produce under clean running water, even if you plan on peeling it, and whether or not it was pre-washed. 
More than 1,000 cases of cyclosporiasis have been confirmed by health officials in more than half of U.S. states, and up to 7,000 cases are suspected. 
RELATED: As many as 59 women were exposed to HIV infection over 'vampire facials' and Botox injections, health officials say 
Those who believe they may be coming down with the sickness are advised to contact health officials and specifically ask for the cyclospora test. 
Cyclospora infections can be treated with antibiotics, rest, and plenty of hydration. 
Like Blaze News? 
Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. 
Sign up here! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 4.1%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Carlos Garcia: 3.4%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic13.1%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias13.1%This article: 15.9%Carlos Garcia: 11.1%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect15.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Carlos Garcia: 12.1%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.8%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.7%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.4%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.2%Carlos Garcia: 3.6%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority26.2%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.4%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Carlos Garcia: 5.1%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 5.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring5.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.3%Carlos Garcia: 10.5%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion9.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.3%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof3.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading6.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.9%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote6.3%This article: 6.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.9%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.3%This article: 5.0%Carlos Garcia: 6.5%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.3%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 5.7%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Carlos Garcia: 3.6%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

397 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech248writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Prater • 25 words • 100.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTaco Bell • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTaco Bell • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Prater • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Prater • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Prater • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Taco Bell

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words29% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%Taco Bell: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Taco Bell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.