Gothamist77%

Bridge over toxic Gowanus Canal reopens after 5 years of repairs 11%

By Stephen Nessen66%

6/15/2026, 9:32:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,675 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

The historic Carroll Street Bridge reopened Monday after a five-year repair project shut down the key connection over the Gowanus Canal. 
The landmarked 137-year-old crossing is one of the oldest in the city and has a unique design. 
It’s shaped like a trapezoid and is retractable  it can split apart to allow boats and barges to pass. 
The bridge closed in 2021 after it was damaged by equipment deployed through the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s cleanup of the canal, a superfund site that’s filled with toxic waste. 
The crossing used to be open to vehicle traffic, but is now only available for pedestrians, cyclists and emergency vehicles. 
A vintage sign now hangs on the bridge that reads: “Ordinance of the City any person driving over this bridge faster than a walk will be subject to a penalty of five dollars for each offense.” 
The Gowanus Remediation Team, which is overseeing the canal’s cleanup effort, wrote in a statement that the bridge would still need to open frequently for 20 minutes at a time to let cleanup equipment through. 
The Carroll Street Bridge is a rarity. 
There are only four other wooden retractable bridges like it in the country, according to the city Department of Transportation. 
There are two in Boston, which are not in use, and one on Borden Avenue in Long Island City, Queens. 
The reopened bridge sits in the heart of the newly rezoned area of Gowanus, which has seen a residential boom in the last few years with new apartment buildings sprouting up along the canal. 
For many residents who’ve moved in recently, they’ve only seen the bridge closed. 
“I've been walking down here for the past year every day looking at the construction, so it's exciting that it's done,” resident Kyle Goodwin, 29, who stopped by to walk across the bridge, said Monday afternoon. 
 I didn't really think it was gonna happen there for a while. 
It looked a little sparse over here for a while, so it was really exciting the past few months to see it happen.” 
During the superfund cleanup, contractors were installing steel pipe piles around the perimeter of the bridge, which damaged the structure so badly it could no longer open and close. 
A section of the span had to "be replaced in order to restore function of the bridge and for the roadway to be reopened,” a construction report found. 
The bridge, which now has a fresh coat of blue paint, restored cobblestones leading to it and fresh wood planks, turned into a sort of destination for people in adjacent neighborhoods on Monday. 
 I went way out of the way just to ride this, so I'm a little bit more of, like, a bridge foamer,” said Tony McIntosh, 30, from Park Slope. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 1.5%Stephen Nessen: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Stephen Nessen: 11.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 4.2%Stephen Nessen: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Stephen Nessen: 4.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias7.6%This article: 2.7%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.7%This article: 6.3%Stephen Nessen: 11.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias6.3%This article: 6.3%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Stephen Nessen: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Stephen Nessen: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.1%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority10.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 8.6%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.1%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.3%Stephen Nessen: 3.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.6%Stephen Nessen: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice7.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

476 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers29%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageGowanus Remediation Team • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Goodwin • 36 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Goodwin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Goodwin • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageTony McIntosh • 30 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tony McIntosh

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words22% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Tony McIntosh: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.