Washington's Democrat ex-governor says she's disgusted at millionaires' tax brought in by her gleeful woke successors 33%

By Stephen M. Lepore0%

5/15/2026, 11:46:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 2,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 852 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,794 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

The Democrat former governor of the state of Washington slammed her party's millionaire's tax causing the wealthy to flee the state while Seattle remains riddled with crime. 
Christine Gregoire, who ran the state from 2005 to 2013, was asked at a recent business summit if the Democrat-led state legislature understood how their tax policy was affecting the state. 
'No, I really don't, as evidenced by, you mentioned the estate tax,' she said, noting the state briefly went to a sky high 35 percent, highest in the nation, before rolling back to 20 percent. 
Now, Washington is merely tied for highest in the United States with Hawaii and has begun imposing a 9.9 percent tax on household incomes above $1 million. 
Gregoire hopes this will finally get Democrats in Washington to see straight. 
'Because here's what you can expect. 
Those people are not homeless. 
They will not pay. 
They're leaving,' she said. 
Gregoire added: 'When they leave, they stop paying capital gains. 
When they leave, they stop giving significantly to philanthropy, which would otherwise be necessary by government. 
So you understand, do you see the consequences of what you're doing? 
And the answer is no.' 
The former governor believes the problem is that there are no Democrats in the state house with any business experience or awareness of how their policies hurt small businesses. 
'I would suggest to you, we don't really have an income problem. 
We have a spending problem, and we're answering it by stacking one more tax, one more rule, one more regulation,' she said. 
'And the one thing that the business community doesn't need is that lack of predictability. 
That's how businesses grow, that's how they thrive. 
That's not healthy for our business community at all.' 
The millionaires' tax was passed earlier this year, but will not take effect until January 1, 2028. 
Gregoire is unlikely to get any sympathy from Seattle's new socialist Mayor Katie Wilson. 
The Daily Mail was in the Emerald City in January as Seattle drug addicts praised the city's new mayor for allegedly telling cops not to arrest people doing illegal substances on the crime-ridden city's streets. 
One 36-year-old local, who gave his name as Brandon, told the Daily Mail that Wilson is 'cool' after her office and Seattle's progressive city attorney Erika Evans reportedly plotted to avoid prosecuting most public drugs use cases. 
Brandon, who lives on the streets because he prefers them to his taxpayer-funded apartment, said of Wilson's new plans: 'They tried to do that already during Covid. 
We went buck wild! 
I'm not gonna lie. 
We blew it up.' 
Clearly excited by a return to the lawless summer of 2020 when a huge swathe of downtown Seattle was taken over by anarchists, fentanyl and meth user Brandon said the government 'should not be going around and telling everybody what to f**king do.' 
Last month, 43-year-old Wilson joked that she would welcome the departure of high earners from her beleaguered city. 
'I think the claims that millionaires are gonna leave our state are super overblown, if the ones that leave, "bye,"' the Democratic Socialist said while waving her right hand. 
The remark was warmly received by the audience, who applauded her for the statement. 
Her response came after being questioned over whether or not progressive tax stances are an 'easy' and 'promising' solution. 
Wilson contended that implementing such changes was not easy but welcomed the recent millionaire tax in the state, which is aimed at the super-rich. 
The move comes after Microsoft president Brad Smith raised the alarm on the state of the business climate in Washington last year. 
He told KOMO News: 'I'm probably more worried right now about the business climate in Washington than at any point over the last 30 years. 
'If other people are paying for jobs to leave and we're taxing them to stay, that will make everything harder.' 
State Republicans criticized the move all the way up until Ferguson signed it in, warning that large corporations like Starbucks and T-Mobile would leave the state. 
Ferguson said that he had a 'lengthy' conversation with Starbucks after they announced they plan to build a new headquarters in Nashville, Tennessee. 
He told reporters: 'Starbucks is an important part of the fabric of our community here in Washington state, to put it mildly', adding that he would support the firm 'in every way possible'. 
Several other businesses, including Amazon and Meta, have already cut jobs in the state. 
Wilson is now in charge of the city, where Starbucks was founded in 1971, after being voted in last year. 
That was despite critics labeling her privileged and out of touch after it emerged she regularly receives checks from her professor parents to pay for childcare. 
Wilson and her husband spend $2,200 per month on daycare for their toddler, and another $2,200 to rent their apartment, it emerged during her campaign. 
She acknowledged her privileged upbringing and said she became aware of it while attending public schools, where she had friends without the same means. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias16.1%This article: 4.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 15.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.8%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic15.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 7.3%Stephen M. Lepore: 9.4%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 1.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.9%This article: 33.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 13.2%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias33.6%This article: 9.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 3.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 3.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.1%This article: 3.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect3.4%This article: 2.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 1.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem11.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority9.4%This article: 7.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 4.4%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon1.6%This article: 14.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 7.1%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion14.6%This article: 1.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 10.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.8%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 20.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal20.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.5%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.8%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote8.5%This article: 5.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 20.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 6.0%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice20.7%This article: 1.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination1.4%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

852 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech485writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 6 words • 100.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 5 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 4 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 4 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 10 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 22 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 15 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 8 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Gregoire • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageBrandon • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wilson • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wilson • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Smith • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Smith • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wilson • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Katie Wilson

100%flagged-word coverage
77 attributed words21% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+7.4 ptsWriter: 30.3%Katie Wilson: 37.7%37.7%Politically Right Leaning -24.3 ptsWriter: 24.3%Katie Wilson: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Katie Wilson: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Katie Wilson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.