KQED61%

Oakland Approves Police Contract With Israeli Intelligence Firm for Phone Searches 46%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

5/7/2026, 9:36:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,059 of 20,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

Activists opposed Oakland’s contract this week with an Israeli cellphone data extraction company, which they say has been used in Israeli military operations in Gaza and to surveil journalists and activists across the world. 
While the Oakland Police Department has contracted with digital intelligence company Cellebrite since 2014, the City Council voted Wednesday to extend the contract through June 2027. 
“By approving this contract, Oakland has chosen to bring in technology tied directly to Israeli occupation forces, the surveillance of Palestinians, and immigration enforcement here in the U.S.,” said Zahra Billoo, the executive director of the Bay Area’s office of the Council of American-Islamic Relations. 
“That decision should never have been made without meaningful engagement with the communities most likely to be impacted by expanded surveillance and discriminatory policing.” 
OPD has used some version of Cellebrite’s technology to download cellphone data, but the most updated version, which the department has used since about 2024, allows it to access data from cellphones without a passcode, according to Sgt. 
Yun Zhou. 
According to city records, the technology is used in both internal audits of OPD members’ work phones and to aid in criminal investigations. 
Last year, Zhou said, the department used Cellebrite to search more than 200 devices obtained through search warrants and thought to be involved in robberies, homicides and other crimes. 
Oakland police headquarters on Nov. 
12, 2016. 
(Alex Emslie/KQED) 
The City Council’s vote to extend the contract, for a price of $140,000, was 6 to 2, with Councilmembers Janani Ramachandran and Carroll Fife opposed. 
According to Fife, Cellebrite’s technology has been used against journalists in Myanmar and Botswana, and activists in Serbia, whose phones were “secretly” unlocked. 
CAIR also said the technology has been used to collect data from Palestinians who have been detained in Gaza. 
And last year, U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement signed a contract to obtain Cellebrite’s tools. 
“I just don’t want Oakland to be part of that list of bad actors who continuously violate human rights,” Fife said. 
Zhou said that Oakland’s data is stored locally through evidence.com and that Cellebrite does not touch it. 
According to the Police Department’s 2024 annual report, “OPD has not shared any Cellebrite extraction data with U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security or U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection.” 
During Wednesday’s meeting, more than 20 people spoke in opposition to the contract, many echoing Fife’s and CAIR’s concerns about human rights violations. 
“The tools provide access to phones, messages, location data, photos, deleted files and obviously that’s immensely intrusive,” said Musa Tariq, CAIR Bay Area’s policy coordinator. 
“This company is kind of part of a broader ecosystem of surveillance where these tools that are developed in militarized or occupation contexts are being exported globally. 
That’s raising concerns about the normalization of these practices, both abroad and then over here at home.” 
Councilmember Carroll Fife speaks during a press conference at Oakland City Hall in Oakland on Aug. 14, 2025, condemning President Trump’s recent remarks about Oakland. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
Zhou said the department “does understand the optics of this company,” but hasn’t been able to identify a comparable alternative for extracting data from Android devices. 
“We are tied to it because of necessity,” he told the councilmembers. 
“If there is a viable replacement, just because of cost alone, I think most of us would switch over.” 
He said the department has tested alternative technologies, including one in the midst of a 30-day trial. 
So far, Zhou told the council, the alternative tool has been used to try to unlock eight phones and failed each test. 
By contrast, he said, Cellebrite has worked to access seven of the eight. 
Councilmember Charlene Wang, who chairs the Public Safety Committee, said it was “undeniable” that Cellebrite had been used by authoritarian governments to surveil people without consent, but added that it’s also used in democratic nations to investigate violent organized crime and human trafficking. 
She said not approving the contract would hurt OPD’s ability to solve violent crimes. 
“We do have trade-offs to make,” she said. 
“We have an obligation to protect our citizens, and to use this technology wisely here in the city of Oakland.” 
Charlene Wang speaks after being sworn in as a city council member for District 2 at City Hall in Oakland, California, on May 20, 2025. 
(Brontë Wittpenn/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images) 
Wang said next year, she would like to see a competitive bidding process for the phone-extraction contract  a usual process for city contracts that was waived in this case. 
Fife asked the department to conduct a review of other vendors that might be available to offer similar technology, as well as an independent legal analysis assessing Cellebrite’s access to the city’s data. 
She also asked that the department publicly report concrete statistics of how the data extraction technology is leading to a decrease in crimes. 
“We keep having to approve contracts that have been shown around the world to have proven violations of people’s human rights,” Fife said. 
“I don’t support the use of this vendor. 
Israel is a genocide state. 
They are utilizing their power and their control and their monopolies in the public safety sector to monopolize law enforcement agencies around the world.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 4.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias6.3%This article: 10.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Framing Effect10.3%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 1.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.9%This article: 4.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 4.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 33.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias33.4%This article: 4.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 7.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.2%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 7.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization13.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 5.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.2%CalMatters: 5.4%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 5.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.2%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground4.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading1.4%This article: 5.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy5.6%This article: 17.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote17.5%This article: 2.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 2.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 8.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination8.2%This article: 0.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

885 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers67%attributed speech296writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageZahra Billoo • 45 words • 0.0% coverageZahra Billoo • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageYun Zhou • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 23 words • 100.0% coverageCouncil of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 21 words • 100.0% coverageYun Zhou • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMusa Tariq • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMusa Tariq • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMusa Tariq • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 26 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 12 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 19 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 17 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 22 words • 0.0% coverageYun Zhou • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCharlene Wang • 43 words • 0.0% coverageCharlene Wang • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCharlene Wang • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCharlene Wang • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCharlene Wang • 30 words • 0.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 33 words • 0.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 23 words • 100.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 8 words • 100.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 5 words • 100.0% coverageCarroll Fife • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zahra Billoo

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words12% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+34.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zahra Billoo: 34.8%34.8%Indoctrination+34.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zahra Billoo: 34.8%34.8%Unattributed Quote-30.4 ptsWriter: 30.4%Zahra Billoo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.