What to know about the wildfire smoke in Philly and its health impacts 43%

By Michelle Myers63% Frank Kummer61%

7/16/2026, 10:41:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 808 faulty-reasoning hits from 774 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,662 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the article peer group.

As Canada grapples with hundreds of active wildfires, the rest of North America is feeling the impacts with air quality alerts. 
In Philadelphia and elsewhere, the air quality score is considered unhealthy, particularly for the most sensitive people. 
Whether you are planning to go out or stay home, here’s what three experts had to say about staying healthy and what precautions are needed: 
What makes this smoke so toxic? 
Exposure to this particular fire smoke is a serious matter due to “photochemical aging,” said Eric Balaban, a pulmonary and critical care fellow at Temple University. 
As smoke travels, it interacts with oxygen, heat, and sunlight, creating a toxic profile that helps generate high levels of ground-level ozone and highly irritating aerosols, Balaban said. 
Ground-level ozone is a pollutant that forms when nitrogen oxides and volatile organics emitted by vehicles, power plants, and industry react in sunlight, especially during hot days such as Thursday. 
The pollutants aren’t the only problem. 
The fine particulate matter within the smoke is small enough to cross from the lungs directly into the bloodstream, Balaban said, increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes, in addition to causing acute chest tightness, shortness of breath, and dizziness in otherwise healthy people. 
Who is at risk during the current unhealthy air quality? 
Philly’s air quality score was in the red stage Thursday, according to the Philadelphia department of public health, meaning we are breathing air considered unhealthy. 
The state Department of Environmental Protection issued a code purple alert for Friday, the second-highest step on the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency’s color scale, which indicates “very unhealthy air.” 
It is not the hazardous condition of the maroon level reached in Minnesota, where everyone is presumed to be impacted. 
But, for Ruth McDermott-Levy, a professor at Villanova University’s school of nursing, “all of us are at risk.” 
The risks increase for those with preexisting conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis. 
“Certainly there are groups of people at greater risk, from pregnant women, children, older people, and those with cardiac and respiratory illnesses. 
But we’re at an unhealthy level for everyone,” McDermott-Levy said. 
Symptoms of poor air quality and sensitive populations 
While most of the city is continuing daily life as normal, Michele Columbo, the allergy and immunology chief at Main Line Health, urged people to keep an eye on how their bodies react to the air quality. 
People can experience “difficulty breeding, dry cough, wheezing, tightness in the chess, and even feel light headed because of [the added] high heat,” Columbo said. 
Children in particular are at risk because they breathe faster than adults. 
And, pregnant people in the third trimester can already be experiencing difficulty breathing without the added contaminants to their lungs. 
Adults 65 years or older, individuals with cardiovascular disease, asthma, and other respiratory issues can also be more affected. 
What precautions to take if you go outside during unhealthy air levels? 
Columbo cautioned people from staying outside for more than a couple of minutes at the time, and even encouraged rescheduling outdoor activities. 
If you can’t avoid going outside, wear an N-95 mask, he said. 
Traditional surgical face masks are not meant to keep out the kind of pollutant particles that fire brings. 
During the 2023 Canada wildfires, experts recommended KN95 and N95 masks as the best options. 
Both Columbo and Balaban urged patients with preexisting conditions to make sure they have extra respiratory medications and inhalers on hand. 
“Anybody with respiratory problems should seek medical advice because it is better to be proactive and inquire medical personnel before the respiratory problem might become potentially more serious,” Columbo said. 
Should you take any precautions if staying inside? 
Balaban recommends replacing the home air-conditioning filters to improve indoor air quality. 
When will air conditions return to normal? 
The health department hopes air quality will improve by the end of Friday, but the U.S. 
Interagency Wildland Fire Air Quality Response Program said good air quality wouldn’t return until Saturday. 
Is fire-related unhealthy air quality the new normal? 
For McDermott-Levy, the newest round of wildfires from Canada, as well as the second heat dome to descend on the area in as many weeks, are a window into the future we might already be living in. 
“This is climate change and we are living it,” she said. 
Balaban encouraged the public to address the “root cause” of it through civic action. 
“We have opportunities to mitigate and prevent these environmental catastrophes from happening, but it is something that we need to agree to do together,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.4%Michelle Myers: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias1.4%This article: 3.2%Michelle Myers: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 5.3%Michelle Myers: 3.4%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.8%Michelle Myers: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Michelle Myers: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 6.7%Michelle Myers: 2.2%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion6.7%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.0%Michelle Myers: 4.7%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Michelle Myers: 11.0%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Michelle Myers: 2.6%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.9%Michelle Myers: 9.6%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority10.9%This article: 1.0%Michelle Myers: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 9.9%Michelle Myers: 3.3%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope9.9%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.9%Michelle Myers: 3.4%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization1.9%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Michelle Myers: 2.2%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 5.0%Michelle Myers: 5.7%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 3.9%Michelle Myers: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 1.4%Michelle Myers: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.4%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.2%Michelle Myers: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.2%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Michelle Myers: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.9%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.8%Michelle Myers: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice0.8%This article: 9.0%Michelle Myers: 6.5%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination9.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle Myers: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

774 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers56%attributed speech340writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageEric Balaban • 26 words • 0.0% coverageEric Balaban • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageEric Balaban • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coveragePhiladelphia department of public health • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Environmental Protection • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRuth McDermott-Levy • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRuth McDermott-Levy • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRuth McDermott-Levy • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Columbo • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Columbo • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Columbo • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Columbo • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Columbo • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageEric Balaban • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageInteragency Wildland Fire Air Quality Response Program • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRuth McDermott-Levy • 37 words • 0.0% coverageRuth McDermott-Levy • 11 words • 0.0% coverageEric Balaban • 14 words • 100.0% coverageEric Balaban • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eric Balaban

81%flagged-word coverage
151 attributed words35% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination+26.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eric Balaban: 26.5%26.5%Unattributed Quote-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Eric Balaban: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Eric Balaban: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.