RedState⁠95%

Historic: Meet the First Ever Lieutenant Governor Nom for AZ - She's Appealing to Rural Voters ⁠47%

By Becca Lower⁠89%

7/31/2026, 1:16:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 773 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (14,902 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the article peer group.

Arizona is one of the few remaining U.S. states without a lieutenant governor - that's about to change in the 2026 midterms, thanks to a voter-passed proposition in 2022. 
As the state's Clean Elections Commission website states: 
The Lieutenant Governor, a newly created office in Arizona, will replace the Secretary of State as the successor to the Governor in the case the Governor dies, resigns, is removed from office or is permanently unable to carry out the duties of the Governor and serves until a successor is elected. 
Historically the Secretary of State has been the second in the chain of command since Arizona statehood in 1912. 
And the deadline is fast approaching for each party to make their historic running mate nomination official: 
Candidates running for Governor must have their second-in-command at least 60 days preceding the November election. 
This means shortly after the 2026 Primary Election final nominees must name their running mates, if they have not done so already. 
Arizona voters will be electing the Governor and Lieutenant Governor on a joint ticket in the November 2026 General Election. 
Republican gubernatorial nominee Rep. 
Andy Biggs (AZ-05) didn't waste any time, announcing his pick on Friday of a former state senator. 
And the video seems to show they're appealing to the state's many rural - and conservative - voters. 
Meet Sine Kerr. 
Watch: 
The daughter of an Army combat veteran and a naturalized U.S. citizen from Mexico, Sine Kerr has lived the American Dream. 
She’s worked as a dairy farmer in Buckeye for over 40 years and represented Maricopa and Yuma counties in the State Senate. 
She and her wonderful husband Bill of 46 years have raised their family of four children and twelve grandchildren in the West Valley and have embodied our Arizona values. 
Sine is strong, steady, and a fighter for Arizona. 
I couldn’t be more thrilled to name her as Arizona’s first nominee for Lieutenant Governor! 
READ MORE: Promises Made: Maricopa County Recorder Shares 'Unprecedented Milestone' in AZ Primary Election 
Kerr thanked Biggs in a post on her X account, as my colleague at sister site Townhall, Cameron Arcand, shared: 
NEW: Sine Kerr will be the Republican Lt. 
Gov nominee on the ticket with Andy Biggs #AZGOV https://t.co/jVUODcIZSe 
— Cameron Arcand (@cameron_arcand) July 31, 2026 
The nomination is getting rave reviews, including from Arizona Freedom Caucus member and state Sen. 
Wendy Rogers: 
@SineKerr will be a FANTASTIC LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR! 
(Pronounced “SEE-nah”) 
She is wise, thoughtful, intelligent, and doggedly gets to the bottom of every issue; my longtime valued ally in the Arizona Senate. 
I am thrilled at this choice! 
https://t.co/kKauhUazVr 
— Wendy Rogers (@WendyRogersAZ) July 31, 2026 
Chief operating officer of TPUSA, Tyler Bowyer echoed Kerr's strong experience with the state's water resources: 
Today the headlines should be about how Katie Hobbs lost Arizona’s most valuable resource— over the next number of years we will lose millions of acre feet thanks to Katie Hobbs which means our economy will suffer. 
These effects won’t be totally felt right away but will drive costs exponentially over the oncoming years. 
That’s why Andy Biggs chose @SineKerr, an expert in this field to fix it. 
Arizona won’t survive electing Katie Hobbs 
Now, that brings up a burning question: what's the hold up on Gov. 
Katie Hobbs' (D) nominee, which she needs to get in by Sept. 
3? 
She's too busy ducking a debate with Biggs. 
She has refused to debate any opponent for eight years, a fact for which Hobbs was just blasted by a member of the local Phoenix media. 
READ MORE: Arizona AG Agrees to Launch Investigation Into Allegations of 'Pay to Play' by Gov Hobbs' Administration 
Lefty Arizona AG Kris Mayes Dismisses 2020 Fake Elector Criminal Case Against Trump Allies - for Now 
Brutal #AZGov segment 
Reporter @Dennis_Welch: "Hobbs does not have a reputation of being a good debater. 
In fact, it's been 8 years" 
Biggs adviser @DrewSexton23: "Hobbs thinks the rules don't apply to her. 
That may be why she's also under criminal investigation for corruption" pic.twitter.com/9hBErno9KD 
— Brian Anderson (@AZBrianAnderson) July 31, 2026 
And oh yeah, she probably doesn't want to talk about being under criminal investigation by state AG Kris Mayes. 
Stay tuned, readers! 
Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. 
Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress. 
Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Becca Lower: 2.5%RedState: 6.4%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.1%RedState: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Becca Lower: 2.6%RedState: 3.3%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.3%RedState: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 1.9%RedState: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Becca Lower: 9.3%RedState: 8.6%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.7%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Becca Lower: 2.0%RedState: 1.5%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 7.8%Becca Lower: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias7.8%This article: 16.4%Becca Lower: 8.9%RedState: 13.0%Negativity Bias16.4%This article: 4.4%Becca Lower: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.9%RedState: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Becca Lower: 5.9%RedState: 4.2%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 2.2%RedState: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Becca Lower: 3.3%RedState: 1.8%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.1%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Becca Lower: 0.5%RedState: 1.1%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Becca Lower: 4.3%RedState: 6.0%Ad Hominem7.2%This article: 4.5%Becca Lower: 1.2%RedState: 2.2%Straw Man4.5%This article: 5.7%Becca Lower: 4.0%RedState: 2.9%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 3.9%Becca Lower: 2.8%RedState: 2.1%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 5.6%Becca Lower: 2.2%RedState: 1.2%Slippery Slope5.6%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Becca Lower: 6.7%RedState: 9.1%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.9%RedState: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.9%Becca Lower: 1.1%RedState: 0.8%Bandwagon1.9%This article: 19.8%Becca Lower: 9.4%RedState: 7.7%Appeal to Emotion19.8%This article: 3.5%Becca Lower: 1.6%RedState: 1.7%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 6.3%Becca Lower: 2.2%RedState: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.7%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.2%RedState: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.2%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Becca Lower: 1.6%RedState: 2.5%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.2%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.4%Becca Lower: 1.1%RedState: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.4%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.9%Becca Lower: 1.1%RedState: 2.3%Unattributed Quote4.9%This article: 1.0%Becca Lower: 1.5%RedState: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 28.1%Becca Lower: 13.2%RedState: 19.3%Biased Writer Voice28.1%This article: 12.2%Becca Lower: 5.0%RedState: 4.3%Indoctrination12.2%This article: 0.0%Becca Lower: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Becca Lower: 16.2%RedState: 14.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias13.5%This article: 6.1%Becca Lower: 4.2%RedState: 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

773 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers33%attributed speech520writer words
Selected voice

RedState

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words7.1% of attributed speech53% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +97.1 ptsWriter: 2.9%RedState: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+92.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%RedState: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +83.5 ptsWriter: 16.5%RedState: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-33.5 ptsWriter: 33.5%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.2 ptsWriter: 0.2%RedState: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.