Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Nominee results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 914 hits. Analysis detected 4,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,874 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,220 of 37,536 keywords). This Republican Nominee is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Republican Nominee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Republican Nominee (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,874
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.3%30.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 31.8%31.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos