BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 1,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 662 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,609 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the article peer group.

Talks between the U.S. and Iran were called off Friday after intense fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, officials said, raising questions about an initial agreement to end the war in Iran. 
Iranian officials didn’t travel as planned to Switzerland, insisting that the fighting in Lebanon must stop before the talks can take place, according to three regional officials and a fourth person familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive conversations behind the scenes. 
Israel’s military struck targets in southern and eastern Lebanon overnight, and Hezbollah reported intense fighting. 
Lebanon’s Health Ministry said at least 21 people were killed, and Israel said four soldiers died. 
The conflict between Israel and the Iran-backed militant group is the most precarious part of the Iran deal. 
Neither Israel nor the militant group signed the agreement  but it is supposed to end their fighting, and Iran has signaled its willingness to risk renewed war in the region for the sake of its interests in Lebanon and its most important regional ally. 
But future talks are supposed to bring about a permanent end to the conflict, including addressing how to restrict Iran’s nuclear program  the core issue over which Israel and the U.S. went to war on Feb. 
28. 
The interim deal has halted hostilities in Iran and the Gulf and reopened the Strait of Hormuz, after Iranian attacks and threats all but stopped the flow of oil and natural gas through the waterway, creating a global energy crisis. 
Still, it is expected to take weeks or months for the normal flow of oil and gas to resume, even if traffic fully resumes. 
The Persian Gulf Strait Authority said Friday that “during the 60-day period, tariffs for security, safety and environmental services, as well as related Iranian insurance, will not be collected from shipowners and will be borne by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” 
“Israel will not tolerate attacks on our soldiers or on our territory, and it will exact a very heavy price from Hezbollah for these attacks,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. 
Hezbollah acknowledged targeting Israeli tanks and said its attacks were in response to what it called Israel’s own violation of the ceasefire. 
It said the attacks came after Israeli forces attempted to reach the northern side of Ali al-Taher hilltop, a strategic point that overlooks Nabatiyeh and that Israeli troops have been trying to capture. 
Israel’s actions have created a rift between Israel and the U.S., with Trump becoming increasingly critical of his close ally Netanyahu, who is also facing increasing criticism at home. 
The discussions in Switzerland are expected to focus on Iran’s nuclear program. 
Tehran maintains it is peaceful, though it has highly enriched uranium that could be used to build multiple atomic bombs, should it choose to do so, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. 
Those talks are expected to be extremely difficult. 
The 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump scrapped during his first term, took more than 18 months to negotiate. 
The interim deal lays out that passage through the strait should be free for 60 days  as it was before the war. 
But the new Iranian authority charged with overseeing the waterway issued guidance Friday calling on ships to register with it  signaling Tehran likely intends to start charging. 
The Persian Gulf Strait Authority said Friday that “during the 60-day period, tariffs for security, safety and environmental services, as well as related Iranian insurance, will not be collected from shipowners and will be borne by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” 
Gambrell reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and Madhani from Zurich. 
Associated Press journalists David Rising in Bangkok, Bassem Mroue in Cairo, Samy Magdy in Tyre, Lebanon, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad and Areej Hazboun in Jerusalem contributed to this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.2%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 4.1%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias12.2%This article: 1.8%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 2.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.8%This article: 16.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 5.4%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic16.3%This article: 2.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.8%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 10.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 3.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 15.0%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.5%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.2%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 3.9%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias5.6%This article: 18.6%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 7.8%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias18.6%This article: 20.4%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 9.6%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias20.4%This article: 6.8%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 2.3%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.8%This article: 4.4%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.5%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.4%This article: 2.4%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.8%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.7%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 6.8%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 3.9%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma6.8%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.4%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 3.4%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.6%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.9%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question5.6%This article: 16.2%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 7.4%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.2%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 2.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 1.4%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 4.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote7.3%This article: 13.3%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 6.1%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection13.3%This article: 7.7%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 2.6%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ERIN CUNNINGHAM: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

662 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers18%attributed speech540writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePersian Gulf Strait Authority • 44 words • 100.0% coverageBenjamin Netanyahu • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePersian Gulf Strait Authority • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words72% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Persian Gulf Strait Authority: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Persian Gulf Strait Authority: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Persian Gulf Strait Authority: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.