AP News53%

People aren’t the only ones hit by heat. What to do if you see wildlife affected by hot temperatures 14%

By Alexa St. John16%

6/26/2026, 9:19:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Nature, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 697 faulty-reasoning hits from 578 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,828 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the article peer group.

As Europe scorches under extreme heat, people aren’t the only ones impacted by the high temperatures and humidity. 
Birds and other wildlife are at risk without respite, too. 
Birds, especially, are crucial to ecosystems across the globe, providing services like pollinating flowers, controlling pests naturally, dispersing seeds and even serving as early warning systems. 
Experts said there are ways to respond if people see a bird in need in the heat, and how to react to other wildlife. 
Here’s what to know. 
What happens to birds in high heat? 
Birds are very diverse, and often well adapted to dealing with prolonged periods of heat, said David Bird, McGill University emeritus professor of wildlife biology. 
They also have a higher body temperature than mammals, with some birds around 38 degrees Celsius (100 degrees Fahrenheit) or even slightly higher. 
They may adjust their feathers in certain ways, or increase airflow across a complex series of air sacs, to help keep cool. 
They also adapt to heat behaviorally. 
But birds have a maximum level of heat they can withstand, just like humans, said Aimee Van Tatenhove, a postdoctoral fellow at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 
Some species, including backyard birds, will “gape,” opening their beaks and panting, not unlike a dog. 
Others will also flutter the pouch skin on their necks to cool off. 
This behavior is known as “gular fluttering.” 
Birds also often seek out shade, and dip in birdbaths, fountains and shallow ponds to lower their body temperatures. 
What should people do if they see birds out in the heat? 
It’s difficult to fully protect birds that are also experiencing the ongoing heat wave, but experts offered a few tips. 
In the short term, people could set up shallow water sources  in spots that are safe from harm, like predators  though experts caution it’s important to keep these baths clean. 
People can also fill bird feeders, providing an easy food source for birds that might be avoiding foraging for their next meal in the hot sun. 
Insect populations are also dramatically down, in part due to climate change and pollution, impacting a major natural food source for birds. 
Over the long term, people who are able to can provide shaded areas around their yard, including layered vegetation such as small shrubs and taller trees, Bird noted. 
If passive approaches aren’t possible, it might be best to leave them be, said Jack Kottwitz, assistant professor at Michigan State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine. 
“These birds know better than what we do about what is comfortable for them.” 
Birds often seek out cooling temperatures, by finding lower places to perch or even fans. 
As far as other wildlife, it might also not be the best choice to try to intervene by giving an animal foreign food or water or attempting to bring it indoors, experts say. 
Local wildlife rehabilitators are the best resource to contact if a sick or injured animal is found, as signs of extreme heat stress can also be similar to those of diseases that wild animals may carry. 
Experts know best how to help wildlife and provide needed care. 
“The best thing for wildlife is to let them be wild,” said Lisa Duke, sanctuary grounds manager at the W.K. 
Kellogg Bird Sanctuary, also affiliated with Michigan State. 
“They know what to do with their bodies.” 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.5%Alexa St. John: 2.2%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Alexa St. John: 3.9%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 5.4%Alexa St. John: 1.5%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Alexa St. John: 0.8%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias3.5%This article: 2.1%Alexa St. John: 6.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect2.1%This article: 6.4%Alexa St. John: 2.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion6.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.7%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.9%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 3.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Alexa St. John: 2.2%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 5.5%Alexa St. John: 5.0%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.4%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Alexa St. John: 1.2%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 1.3%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.4%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 38.8%Alexa St. John: 10.0%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority38.8%This article: 10.2%Alexa St. John: 4.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma10.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Alexa St. John: 3.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 3.6%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.9%Alexa St. John: 0.2%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 3.8%Alexa St. John: 3.4%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.8%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 8.3%Alexa St. John: 2.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature8.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%Alexa St. John: 0.6%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Alexa St. John: 2.4%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.3%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 3.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 3.9%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa St. John: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

578 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers26%attributed speech430writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Bird • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAimee Van Tatenhove • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Bird • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJack Kottwitz • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJack Kottwitz • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Duke • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Duke • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jack Kottwitz

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words27% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+35.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jack Kottwitz: 35.0%35.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.