RFK Jr. Now Has to Deal With Explosive Diarrhea Outbreak 58%

By Malcolm Ferguson68%

7/7/2026, 7:03:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 622 faulty-reasoning hits from 308 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,017 of 21,164 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the article peer group.

An “explosive” diarrhea virus is tearing through the Midwestern United States, presenting yet another challenge for Health Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr. and the weakened Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
The CDC initially only reported 145 confirmed cases of cyclosporiasis last month in the U.S. 
But on July 1, Michigan health officials confirmed 100 more cases in only nine days, a troubling spike. 
The cyclosporiasis infection—caused by “a one-celled parasite too small to be seen with the naked eye”—has impacted nearly 700 people in Michigan and Illinois. 
It can be found in contaminated water and unwashed leafy produce, and is most active in the spring and summer. 
Symptoms begin with diarrhea, then can include appetite loss, bloating, nausea, cramping, and fatigue. 
Confirmed cases include those aged five to 86, with over 60 percent of them being women. 
There have been no deaths, although 20 people have been hospitalized. 
While this parasite appears every year, this many cases is certainly abnormal. 
Last year there were only 50 confirmed cases in Michigan, according to NBC Chicago. 
“Outbreaks of cyclosporiasis have been occurring across the United States and now here in Michigan,” the state’s chief medical executive, Dr. 
Natasha Bagdasarian, said in a statement. 
“Based on the unusual number of cases we have identified in a little over a week, we anticipate additional cases of illness being reported. 
We recommend Michiganders contact their health care provider if they experience sudden, ongoing diarrhea and reach out to their local health department if additional members of their family are suffering from the same symptoms.” 
The temperature is extremely high in many parts of the United States, and public trust in the CDC is extremely low. 
The next few weeks will be a significant test on their ability to manage outbreaks like this. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.6%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias7.8%This article: 4.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 5.2%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 11.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect26.3%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias9.4%This article: 38.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 17.7%newrepublic.com: 12.9%Negativity Bias38.3%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.2%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 4.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.2%newrepublic.com: 3.7%Ad Hominem3.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority1.9%This article: 5.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 6.7%newrepublic.com: 7.9%Hasty Generalization5.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 8.9%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion15.9%This article: 7.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question7.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.3%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 23.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice23.4%This article: 11.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination11.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 10.3%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

308 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers26%attributed speech229writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNatasha Bagdasarian • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words19% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.4 ptsWriter: 31.4%Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.