Anthropic is discussing a new custom chip with Samsung 27%

By Lucas Ropek25%

7/2/2026, 6:31:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 544 faulty-reasoning hits from 310 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,137 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the article peer group.

Back in April, Reuters reported that Anthropic was toying with the idea of producing its own AI chips as a means of responding to chip shortages. 
Now, it would appear that the company is getting serious about this idea. 
On Thursday, The Information reported that Anthropic was in contact with Samsung to explore a collaboration around the pending chip. 
However, Anthropic hasn’t yet decided what the chip will be used for, how it will fit into the server, or how powerful it will be, according to the report. 
When reached for comment, Anthropic told TechCrunch that a diversified hardware stack that includes chips from Google, Amazon, and Nvidia will continue to be pivotal to its compute strategy. 
On the topic of a potential Samsung partnership, the company said it had nothing further to add. 
A number of AI companies have sought to develop custom chips  both as a way to create unique hardware for specific compute tasks and to gain a certain amount of independence from Nvidia, which continues to be the undisputed leader of the chip industry. 
Anthropic's announcement may also be a response to one made last week by its key competitor, OpenAI, which has teamed up with Broadcom to announce its own custom-built inference processor, dubbed “Jalapeño.” 
OpenAI says that the chip is more efficient, demonstrating better performance-per-watt, than other competitor chips. 
Amazon and Google both offer custom-built TPUs as part of their cloud offering. 
Samsung is already embedded in the AI industry, and acts as a major partner of Nvidia, producing chips that the company needs to train or run its AI models. 
In turn, Samsung uses Nvidia's software to manufacture its chips. 
The duo are working on an AI chip factory in South Korea. 
Samsung has also discussed partnering with Google on its chip-making efforts. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.9%TechCrunch: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.8%TechCrunch: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Lucas Ropek: 3.2%TechCrunch: 3.5%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 14.5%Lucas Ropek: 1.4%TechCrunch: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic14.5%This article: 4.2%Lucas Ropek: 0.5%TechCrunch: 0.6%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 2.0%TechCrunch: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 4.9%TechCrunch: 4.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 18.7%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 3.5%TechCrunch: 4.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.0%TechCrunch: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 5.5%TechCrunch: 5.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Lucas Ropek: 0.7%TechCrunch: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias4.8%This article: 3.2%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.5%TechCrunch: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Lucas Ropek: 1.4%TechCrunch: 3.5%Halo Effect23.9%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.5%Lucas Ropek: 1.7%TechCrunch: 2.3%Recency Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Lucas Ropek: 2.5%TechCrunch: 4.4%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.9%TechCrunch: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%Lucas Ropek: 5.1%TechCrunch: 6.0%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.2%TechCrunch: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 2.8%TechCrunch: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.3%Lucas Ropek: 3.1%TechCrunch: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.3%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.9%TechCrunch: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 2.8%TechCrunch: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 47.4%Lucas Ropek: 3.1%TechCrunch: 2.0%Unattributed Quote47.4%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.9%TechCrunch: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.2%Lucas Ropek: 4.2%TechCrunch: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice4.2%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 4.2%TechCrunch: 4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

310 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers29%attributed speech220writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageThe Information • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageTechCrunch • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageOpenAI • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

OpenAI

100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words17% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+74.1 ptsWriter: 25.9%OpenAI: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%OpenAI: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.