Why Wall Street thinks US memory maker Micron is the next Nvidia 63%

By Kirsten Korosec29%

6/28/2026, 3:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 631 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,769 of 20,498 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the article peer group.

Micron, the Boise, Idaho-based memory chip maker, has captured Wall Street’s heart. 
Whether the love affair endures will heavily depend on how long the AI-driven supply crunch for memory chips lasts. 
Micron promises that it has shored up its position for the long term, which would allow it to withstand a sudden drop in demand or overcapacity of supply. 
And Wall Street has become a believer, helping Micron briefly surpass the market valuation of Meta and Tesla for the first time on Thursday, though it floated back down by Friday to nearly match them. 
Specifically Micron closed Friday’s trading with a market cap close to $1.27 trillion, while Meta was at $1.39 trillion and Tesla was at $1.42 trillion. 
Micron’s stock has soared over 236% in the past month alone, closing Friday at $1,132 a share. 
In comparison, it spent years upon years before mid-2025 at below $100 a share. 
It’s a dizzying rise for a company that most consumers associated with the tiny memory cards that, back in the day, were commonly needed to boost PCs, smartphones, or other device storage. 
Wall Street isn’t sweating over that product line. 
Micron is benefiting from the AI data center buildout boom that has created a shortage of system memory chips, both DRAM and NAND, which Micron makes, particularly High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM). 
A single AI server requires magnitudes more memory than a laptop. 
AI system makers like Nvidia, as well as the hyperscalers building their own systems, are buying up large quantities of memory, such as Microsoft, Amazon AWS, Google, Meta and Oracle. 
This is forcing all the other companies who need memory to hoard it as well, from PC makers like Dell and HP, to other kinds of device makers. 
This lack of supply, which has been dubbed RAMageddon, is predicted to persist into 2027. 
And it’s already driving up the price of consumer electronics like Apple products and Xbox consoles. 
With the whole tech industry clamoring for more memory, Micron’s delivered blockbuster third-quarter earnings last week. 
Revenue quadrupled year-over-year to $41.45 billion, and profits skyrocketed from $1.88 billion to $28.2 billion over the same period. 
Micron also provided a positive outlook, forecasting fourth-quarter revenue of between $49 billion and $51 billion. 
And Wall Street, which has been eager to find more public AI-related companies that may do as well as Nvidia, became even more enamored. 
The historic problem for memory chip makers like Micron and Samsung is that building out manufacturing facilities to increase capacity is a time-consuming, expensive endeavor. 
And demand often falls just as companies can increase capacity, creating a glut and subsequent price drop. 
Micron got ahead of any AI bust chatter by emphasizing a series of long-term supply agreements, including with Nvidia and AI lab Anthropic, that would presumably protect it. 
The company said in its earnings presentation that it has signed 16 strategic customer agreements across the data center, consumer, and auto market segments, which it expects to fundamentally transform its business model. 
That seemed to convince a number of analysts that this company could be another long-term, profitable investment. 
In a research note, William Blair tech analyst Sebastien Naji noted demand growth continues to outpace the rate that new cleanroom space can come online. 
“Given the strong likelihood of continued ASP growth in the coming quarters and improving revenue visibility thanks to a rapidly expanding set of long-term agreements (SCAs) with key customers, we see potential for more durable earnings growth and reiterate our Outperform rating,” Naji wrote. 
Whether Micron really can sustain itself for long-term without a bust cycle remains to be seen. 
But for a brief moment on Thursday, this U.S. company was more valuable than some of the industry’s giants. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.8%Kirsten Korosec: 2.2%TechCrunch: 3.0%Confirmation Bias26.8%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.3%TechCrunch: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Kirsten Korosec: 3.1%TechCrunch: 3.4%Availability Heuristic14.9%This article: 10.8%Kirsten Korosec: 0.9%TechCrunch: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.8%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%Kirsten Korosec: 1.2%TechCrunch: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias15.4%This article: 1.9%Kirsten Korosec: 5.0%TechCrunch: 4.6%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.6%TechCrunch: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.6%TechCrunch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.8%Kirsten Korosec: 3.9%TechCrunch: 5.0%Optimism Bias16.8%This article: 5.2%Kirsten Korosec: 0.6%TechCrunch: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 2.5%Kirsten Korosec: 6.6%TechCrunch: 5.0%Negativity Bias2.5%This article: 5.2%Kirsten Korosec: 1.3%TechCrunch: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Kirsten Korosec: 1.9%TechCrunch: 3.3%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.7%Kirsten Korosec: 2.7%TechCrunch: 2.3%Recency Bias18.7%This article: 2.2%Kirsten Korosec: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.2%This article: 2.5%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.9%TechCrunch: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.7%Kirsten Korosec: 3.0%TechCrunch: 4.2%Appeal to Authority27.7%This article: 7.4%Kirsten Korosec: 1.3%TechCrunch: 1.6%False Dilemma7.4%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.6%TechCrunch: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 7.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Circular Reasoning7.0%This article: 21.2%Kirsten Korosec: 3.2%TechCrunch: 6.0%Hasty Generalization21.2%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.9%Kirsten Korosec: 1.1%TechCrunch: 1.2%Bandwagon13.9%This article: 8.7%Kirsten Korosec: 2.1%TechCrunch: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 4.4%Kirsten Korosec: 0.6%TechCrunch: 0.6%Begging the Question4.4%This article: 10.0%Kirsten Korosec: 2.3%TechCrunch: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.8%Kirsten Korosec: 1.5%TechCrunch: 2.3%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Kirsten Korosec: 1.1%TechCrunch: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 9.7%Kirsten Korosec: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.1%Special Pleading9.7%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.0%Kirsten Korosec: 1.1%TechCrunch: 1.9%Unattributed Quote7.0%This article: 7.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.8%TechCrunch: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.0%This article: 20.0%Kirsten Korosec: 5.8%TechCrunch: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice20.0%This article: 4.4%Kirsten Korosec: 0.7%TechCrunch: 0.8%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kirsten Korosec: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Kirsten Korosec: 3.4%TechCrunch: 4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.2%

631 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech529writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMicron • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSebastien Naji • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSebastien Naji • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sebastien Naji

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words68% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+63.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sebastien Naji: 63.8%63.8%Quote-first Misdirection+63.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sebastien Naji: 63.8%63.8%Biased Writer Voice-23.8 ptsWriter: 23.8%Sebastien Naji: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Sebastien Naji: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.