Tens of thousands of No Kings protesters march through Manhattan decrying Trump 66%

By Julian Roberts-Grmela0% Nicholas Williams58% Thomas Tracy42%

3/28/2026, 7:25:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 1,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,451 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

Tens of thousands of protesters railing against ICE, the war in Iran and President Trump’s “ongoing consolidation of executive power” took to Manhattan’s streets Saturday with one unified cry: “No Kings.” 
Toting banners reading “We Will Not Be Silenced,” “Dump Trump” and “No War, No Kings,” and carrying signs demanding “ICE out of NYC,” protesters streamed through Midtown, shouting for sweeping changes in Washington, D.C., and the White House. 
As they marched through Times Square, they chanted, “Show me what democracy looks like! 
This is what democracy looks like!”, “Who’s got the power? 
We’ve got the power!” 
and “No ICE, no KKK, no fascist USA!” 
Earlier on Saturday, thousands of protesters could be seen marching through the streets of D.C., Philadelphia and Atlanta. 
Protesters on Saturday called for an end to the weaponization of ICE and federal agencies, as well as devastating cuts to essential services like Medicaid and public education. 
The demonstrators were joined by New York State Attorney General Letitia James, noted activists, such as the Rev. 
Al Sharpton, and movie star Robert De Niro. 
The three teamed up to carry a light-green banner reading “We Protect Our Democracy.” 
From left, New York Attorney General Letitia James, actor Robert De Niro and Rev. 
Al Sharpton take part in a No Kings protest Saturday, March 28, 2026, in New York. 
(AP Photo/Adam Gray) 
“When the crowds are chanting ‘No Kings,’ what I’m really hearing is, as we all know, ‘No Trump,'” De Niro said at a press conference before the rally began. 
“There have been other presidents that have tested the constitutional limits of their power, but none of them have been an existential threat to our freedom and security.” 
“He must be stopped and must be stopped now,” the Oscar-winning actor continued. 
“And he cannot do all the f—ed-up things he’s doing without the collusion of Congress and the goons in his administration. 
It’s diabolical.” 
The turnout was huge. 
Protesters filled both Seventh Ave. and Broadway from 59th St. to 42nd St., then converged and marched down Seventh to 34th St., where the demonstration ended. 
Beyond Trump himself, chief among the concerns of protesters The News spoke with was the issue of wealth inequality. 
Pepper, a 66-year-old woman from the Bronx, watched the waves of protesters stream by as she sat in her walker. 
“Because he’s not for us,” she declared of Trump. 
“He’s not for the people. 
I did not vote for him, and he’s against me and my people.” 
“He’s against all low-income people. 
He’s just for the rich,” Pepper said. 
“It’s not our fault that we was born poor. 
We wasn’t even born poor. 
We were born as kings and queens, and they took us from our country and brought us over here and made us slaves, and when they got tired of us, then they threw us out. 
So we had no other choice but to be poor, and we’re tired of it.” 
Veteran protester Paul Nagle warned of the dangers of income inequality. 
(Julian Roberts-Grmela / NY Daily News) 
In a similar vein, Brenda, 69, a protester from Long Island, said, “No one seems to care about us. 
It’s the billionaires. 
It’s the very rich, and that’s what it’s about.” 
“So we’re hoping,” she said, while holding a “No Thrones, No Crowns, No Kings” sign as she marched, “you know, just to make a point with all of these people today, it’s great to see. 
And as a senior, what’s really great to see (is) a lot of seniors out here, I am shocked.” 
“I’ve been doing this since 1969,” said Paul Nagle, 67, a protester from Brooklyn. 
“I was 11 years old, out marching against the Vietnam War.” 
“All of this is facilitated only if there’s an incredible divide between rich and poor,” he stressed. 
“We must, like, never stop having our eye on that, as well. 
It’s got to be part of the fight. 
We have to tax the rich and the corporations.” 
The police presence at the protest was large, too, including members of the Strategic Response Group and cops from the counterterrorism and community affairs units. 
“There will be an adequate security deployment,” an NYPD spokesman told the Daily News in a statement Friday ahead of the march. 
Amid heighten tensions due to the Iran war, a few weeks ago an ISIS-inspired protester unleashed homemade bombs outside of Gracie Mansion. 
No arrests were made at Saturday’s protest, cops said. 
People take part in the No Kings protest Saturday, March 28, 2026, in New York. 
(AP Photo/Adam Gray) 
This marked the fourth No Kings protest held in New York City. 
Tens of thousands marched against the Trump administration and its right-wing, anti-immigrant policies during last year’s protests, which are meant to defend democracy and reject authoritarian governance. 
The most recent No Kings protest, held in January, only drew what the NYPD estimated as around 2,000 people. 
But an estimated 100,000 people swelled a No Kings march on a warm day last October, while roughly 50,000 people endured rain to march in the city’s inaugural No Kings protest last June. 
While 100 people were arrested at the city’s first No Kings protest late last spring, the NYPD said no arrests were made in October. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 4.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 2.1%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 5.1%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect13.4%This article: 1.7%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 1.4%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 5.3%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 12.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 9.5%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias12.0%This article: 3.5%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.3%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 6.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 1.2%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 3.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 7.1%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.8%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization8.8%This article: 3.1%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring3.1%This article: 3.7%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon3.7%This article: 6.7%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 6.9%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 1.9%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 6.3%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.1%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote4.1%This article: 3.3%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 3.5%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 5.4%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice3.5%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julian Roberts-Grmela: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

885 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers42%attributed speech511writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRobert De Niro • 29 words • 100.0% coverageRobert De Niro • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRobert De Niro • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRobert De Niro • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRobert De Niro • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 35 words • 0.0% coveragePepper • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBrenda • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrenda • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBrenda • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBrenda • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBrenda • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 11 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 8 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Nagle • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD spokesman • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robert De Niro

100%flagged-word coverage
93 attributed words25% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+31.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robert De Niro: 31.2%31.2%Unattributed Quote-7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Robert De Niro: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Robert De Niro: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.