Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan Protests results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 3,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,371 of 37,536 keywords). This Manhattan Protests is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Manhattan Protests
Keyword details
Total words: 3,540
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst