Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video1,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoning Ordinances results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (21,293 of 22,956 topics). This Zoning Ordinances is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Zoning Ordinances
Topic details
Total words: 5,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos