Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video3,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World War Ii Justification results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 8,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (17,973 of 24,545 topics). This World War Ii Justification is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
World War Ii Justification
Topic details
Total words: 12,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos