Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Women In Journalism results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 906 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,083 topics). This Women In Journalism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Women In Journalism
Topic details
Total words: 7,179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos