Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wnba Eligibility results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Straw Man, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 1,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (13,707 of 24,545 topics). This Wnba Eligibility is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Wnba Eligibility
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos