Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video1,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Biology results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 2% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 340 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,023 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (22,685 of 23,411 topics). This Wildlife Biology is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Wildlife Biology
Topic details
Total words: 4,023
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos