Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whistleblower Cases results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 1,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,719 of 22,683 topics). This Whistleblower Cases is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Whistleblower Cases
Topic details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos