Topic summary
⁠99%2 analyzed articles/videos1,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War In Iran results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 5,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,767 of 22,501 topics). This War In Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
War In Iran
Topic details
Total words: 4,158
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos