Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wage Disputes results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,664 topics). This Wage Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wage Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 1,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos