Topic summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Senate Voting results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 187 hits . Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,472 of 22,420 topics). This US Senate Voting is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. US Senate Voting
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst