Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These University Expansion results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 756 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,848 topics). This University Expansion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
University Expansion
Topic details
Total words: 2,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos