Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video1,697 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UN Hamas Ties results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,010 hits. Analysis detected 6,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (7,223 of 21,368 topics). This UN Hamas Ties is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
UN Hamas Ties
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos