Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transit Updates results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 402 faulty-reasoning hits from 900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,282 of 23,373 topics). This Transit Updates is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Transit Updates
Topic details
Total words: 900
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles900 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 3.9%3.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos